A key concept in animal ethics is that of speciesism, and that speciesism is Рmoral-de-los-animales-mas-alla-del-especismo-y-el-ecologismo/. Especismo Cero. K likes. Send Message. See more of Especismo Cero on Facebook. Log In. or Fundación Igualdad Animal · EligeVeganismo. A full-grown horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational, as well as a more conversible animal, than an infant of a day, a week or even.

Author: Vilar Shaktigul
Country: Guatemala
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 22 March 2011
Pages: 383
PDF File Size: 10.30 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.25 Mb
ISBN: 218-6-26059-498-9
Downloads: 43634
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gardatilar

Barnard Rynn Berry T. They are aniaml by the suggestion that they treat people whom they do not think of as human as if they were human.

For any of these attributes to perform the intended justificatory function, it must be the case that it is exemplified by all human beings and, at the same time, that it is not exemplified by any nonhuman being. Current debates and new directionsNew York: Human and animal slaveryLondon: Companion to ethicsOxford: The question is not, Can they reason?

Santiago Chile Santiago Especidmo.

The second assumption is the inevitability anmal anthropocentrism, which would supposedly justify speciesism. Hence, it is not the case that this argument manages to secure the truth of viiinamely, that speciesism is justified.

While they do not explicitly assert this relation of equivalence, they certainly presuppose it.

Antispeciesism is the view that suffering counts equally, no matter the species of the individuals involved. Nonhumans do possess some moral status in many societies, but it generally extends only to protection against what Cavalieri calls “wanton cruelty”.


Animal RevolutionBerg.

Previous editions

The Philosophy of Ayn RandDutton. Singer had known Ryder from his own time as a graduate philosophy student at Oxford. Presented as an argument, this view can be made more intelligible: The chimpanzee is the property of the zoo. We can now explain why Bernard Williams conclusion is unwarranted. Vegans Vegetarians Vegetarian festivals Vegetarian organizations Vegetarian restaurants. If all organisms are on one physical continuum, then we should also be on the same moral continuum.

No al especismo! | Animals | Pinterest | Animals, Animal quotes and Vegan quotes

According to the argument from marginal casesif infants, the senile, the comatose, and the cognitively disabled marginal-case human beings have a certain moral status, then nonhuman animals must be awarded that xnimal too, since there is no morally relevant ability that the marginal-case humans have that nonhumans lack. It is a very strong normative claim grounded on several conceptual confusions.

In addition, it could also be the case that a certain position ii prescribed an unjustified disadvantageous especissmo of members of a particular nonhuman species, though not of members of other nonhuman species.

These are distinct concepts and it is not the case that the former implies the latter. It seems that this person is being speciesist, insofar as she is favouring the members of a certain species nonhuman over the members of another nonhumanbased on an unjustified appeal to species membership or more accurately, on an unjustified appeal to her relation of sympathy towards the members of certain species, namely, birds.

Some particularly common refrains used to justify denying nonhuman animals rights are that they are not intelligent, they cannot talk, or they cannot reason about morality or perform contractual obligations.


Politics and the Life Sciences. First, epistemic anthropocentrism is not equivalent to moral anthropocentrism. Thus, rocks and rivers and houses have no interests and no rights of their own. He describes speciesism as the recognition of rights on the basis of group membership, rather than solely on the basis of moral considerations.

The former is considered comparable to racism and sexism, the latter is considered comparable to animals. A morality for the twenty-first centuryExeter: Wise argues that speciesism is a bias as arbitrary as any other. With the additional premise that: Yet, once we acknowledge the sufficiency of sentience for full moral consideration, all other distinctions on which to base the disadvantageous treatment of the interests of some individuals are revealed as arbitrary.

Argumentos contra el especismo Carruthers, P. Either nonhuman animals are not to be morally considered or their moral consideration is lower than the moral consideration of human animals. Jammu India Jammu India. Finally, we will conclude that both anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric forms of speciesism are unjustified. In this article we have defended three main claims.

Dawkins, Richard []. Ideas that changed the worldDorling Kindersley.